Troubleshooting Credential and Session Failures in Blue Prism Automation

Details: Category: Automation; By Mindful Chase; 22.Jul; Hits: 3

Blue Prism is a leading Robotic Process Automation (RPA) platform used in large enterprises for automating high-volume, rules-based business processes. Despite its enterprise-grade capabilities, teams often encounter hidden technical challenges when scaling bots across environments, especially in scenarios involving credential management, scheduling conflicts, object-level errors, and misconfigured queues. A common but complex issue is the erratic failure of processes that work flawlessly in development but fail silently or partially in production. These failures are usually tied to environmental inconsistencies, resource locks, or session mismanagement. This article provides a deep-dive into these automation anomalies in Blue Prism and offers a systematic approach to diagnose, fix, and harden large-scale RPA deployments.

Mindful Chase

Writing Code, Writing Stories

tbd

Experience

tbd

More to Explore

Architectural Overview of Blue Prism Automation

Control Room, Runtime Resources, and Schedulers

Blue Prism's automation depends on three critical components: the Control Room (for orchestrating bots), Runtime Resources (machines executing processes), and the Scheduler. Communication among these elements occurs over WCF using configured ports and service credentials. Breakdowns in this architecture often result in jobs being marked as completed even when the automation fails midway.

Credential Manager and Environmental Dependencies

Credentials used in processes are encrypted and stored in Credential Manager. Bots failing due to 'invalid credentials' often stem from missing environment tags, incorrect access rights, or updates in Active Directory that are not propagated to Blue Prism's credential cache.

Diagnosing Common Blue Prism Failures

Process Succeeds in Dev but Fails in Production

Root causes often include:

Different credential object names across environments.
Subtle UI changes in production apps not present in dev.
Hard-coded paths or timeouts not adjusted for slower systems.

Session Timeout or Resource Lock Errors

When multiple processes attempt to access the same runtime resource, Blue Prism may generate session lock conflicts:

"ERROR: Unable to start session as resource is busy or locked"

To resolve:

Enable session monitoring in Control Room logs.
Configure staggered schedules or resource pools.
Set intelligent retry logic via Work Queue exception handling.

Step-by-Step Fixes for Process Instability

1. Validate Credential Objects Across Environments

// Check if credential exists
If [Credential Exists("App_Prod_Login")] = False Then
    Log "Missing credential object in production"
    Throw Exception "Missing credential object in Prod"
End If

2. Avoid Hard-Coded UI Paths

Use dynamic attributes in Application Modeller to locate UI elements based on relative hierarchy rather than absolute screen coordinates.

3. Introduce Work Queue Retry Strategies

// On exception, retry up to 3 times with delay
If [Retries] < 3 Then
    Delay 00:00:10
    Increment [Retries]
    Requeue current item
Else
    Mark item as Exception
End If

4. Enable Full Logging in Control Room

Set process log level to "Stage logging" and export logs for post-failure diagnostics. Log every data item mutation and exception output during test runs.

5. Patch Environment Differences via Environment Variables

Use Blue Prism's Environment Variables feature to avoid hardcoding machine-dependent data, URLs, or service names across Dev, Test, and Prod.

Best Practices for Enterprise-Grade RPA with Blue Prism

Enforce naming conventions and access rights on all credential objects.
Use audit trails and process change control through Blue Prism Release Manager.
Centralize exception handling logic in reusable process layers.
Integrate Blue Prism with Splunk or ELK for real-time log analysis.
Schedule performance benchmarking of runtime resources monthly.

Conclusion

Blue Prism offers a powerful automation platform, but scaling it reliably requires architectural diligence. Process failures often hide behind environmental mismatches, credential misalignments, and resource contention. By implementing structured diagnostics, environment-agnostic configuration practices, and robust exception handling, RPA teams can significantly reduce bot downtime and maximize automation ROI. Treating Blue Prism as a managed software delivery ecosystem, rather than a UI macro tool, is essential to achieving enterprise automation maturity.

FAQs

1. Why does my Blue Prism process complete without errors but the task isn't actually done?

This usually occurs when exception paths are not correctly routed or a business exception is mistakenly flagged as success. Always log and handle all exit points.

2. How can I simulate production issues in development?

Use identical environment variables and application versions, and mock slower response times or restricted access to test error paths realistically.

3. Why are credentials failing only in production?

The credential object might be missing the right environment tag or permissions. Check Credential Manager for scope mismatches or AD sync issues.

4. Can Blue Prism retry failed items automatically?

Yes, using Work Queues with custom retry logic allows reattempting items with delay intervals. Design retry loops within the exception handling logic.

5. How do I prevent session lock conflicts?

Use dedicated runtime resources per critical process or staggered schedules. Also, monitor session state via API or Control Room dashboard.

Contact Us