Troubleshooting Azure Kubernetes Service: Scaling, Networking, and Storage Challenges

Details: Category: Cloud Platforms and Services; By Mindful Chase; 25.Aug; Hits: 18

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) has become a cornerstone for running containerized workloads in enterprise cloud environments. While AKS simplifies cluster provisioning and management, day-to-day troubleshooting can quickly become complex in large-scale systems. Issues such as cluster scaling failures, persistent volume binding errors, networking bottlenecks, and node pool inconsistencies often surface only under production workloads. For senior engineers and architects, understanding the root causes and long-term architectural fixes is critical to maintaining reliable, cost-efficient Kubernetes clusters in Azure.

Mindful Chase

Writing Code, Writing Stories

tbd

Experience

tbd

More to Explore

Background: Why AKS Troubleshooting is Unique

Managed Yet Complex

AKS abstracts much of the operational overhead of Kubernetes, but enterprises still face responsibility for workload design, networking, and security. The shared responsibility model means failures may stem from misconfiguration, scaling limits, or Azure platform nuances.

High Availability Requirements

Unlike dev clusters, enterprise AKS deployments often run mission-critical applications. Even minor misconfigurations in networking or persistent storage can trigger cascading outages across microservices.

Architectural Implications

Scaling Limitations

Node pools in AKS are bound by Azure VM quotas, regional capacity, and autoscaler logic. Poorly tuned autoscaling leads to delayed pod scheduling and service degradation.

Networking Complexity

AKS clusters rely on Azure CNI or kubenet for networking. IP exhaustion, overlapping CIDR ranges, and misconfigured network policies can block service communication. These are architectural concerns requiring careful subnet planning.

Diagnostics

Investigating Node Pool Issues

Check cluster autoscaler logs for errors related to VM provisioning. Failures often point to quota exhaustion or unavailable VM SKUs in a region.

kubectl -n kube-system logs deployment/cluster-autoscaler
az vm list-usage --location eastus

Debugging Persistent Volume Claims (PVCs)

When PVCs remain pending, inspect storage class and Azure Disk availability. A mismatch between storage class and node pool capabilities is a common cause.

kubectl describe pvc mydata-pvc

Tracing Network Bottlenecks

Use kubectl exec and kubectl trace to verify pod-to-pod communication. IP exhaustion is diagnosed by checking subnet utilization.

az network vnet subnet show --resource-group myRG --vnet-name myVnet --name aks-subnet

Common Pitfalls

Improper subnet sizing: Leads to IP exhaustion as clusters scale.
Mixing system and user workloads on the same node pool: Causes resource contention and scheduling failures.
Ignoring upgrade policies: Results in unexpected downtime during node image or version upgrades.
Unrestricted network policies: Leads to security risks and lateral movement across workloads.
Overprovisioning storage classes: Causes cost overruns and PVC binding failures.

Step-by-Step Fixes

1. Fix Cluster Autoscaling

Ensure quotas are increased in Azure and VM SKUs are available in the region. Tune autoscaler profiles for faster scale-out.

az vm list-skus --location eastus --size Standard_DS2_v2

2. Resolve Persistent Volume Issues

Match storage classes with node pool availability. For high-performance workloads, ensure that nodes support Premium SSDs or Ultra Disks.

3. Prevent IP Exhaustion

Pre-plan subnet sizes and use Azure CNI with larger CIDRs. Monitor utilization with Azure Monitor and proactively expand IP ranges.

4. Separate System and User Node Pools

Isolate critical system pods (kube-dns, kube-proxy) from user workloads. This prevents starvation of core Kubernetes services.

5. Harden Network Policies

Apply Kubernetes NetworkPolicies and Azure NSGs to enforce least privilege access between services and external systems.

Best Practices for Long-Term Stability

Use availability zones for high availability across failure domains.
Automate node pool upgrades using staged rollout strategies.
Regularly audit Azure quotas to avoid unexpected scaling failures.
Integrate AKS monitoring with Azure Monitor and Application Insights.
Adopt GitOps or Infrastructure as Code for consistent AKS configuration.

Conclusion

Troubleshooting AKS goes beyond debugging YAML files—it requires understanding Azure's infrastructure and Kubernetes internals together. Issues like autoscaler failures, PVC binding problems, and IP exhaustion are symptoms of deeper architectural misalignments. By isolating system workloads, planning subnets, monitoring quotas, and tuning scaling, enterprise teams can achieve resilient and efficient AKS clusters that meet mission-critical demands.

FAQs

1. Why do AKS autoscalers fail to add new nodes?

Common causes include Azure VM quota limits, unavailable SKUs in a region, or misconfigured autoscaler profiles. Check both Azure quotas and cluster-autoscaler logs.

2. How do I prevent PVCs from getting stuck in pending state?

Ensure that the storage class matches the node pool's capabilities and the underlying Azure Disk or File resources are available. Cross-region storage is not supported for AKS PVCs.

3. What is the best strategy to avoid IP exhaustion in AKS?

Plan larger CIDR ranges for subnets during initial deployment and use Azure CNI. For existing clusters, expand subnets proactively before reaching critical thresholds.

4. Should system and application workloads share the same node pool?

No. Mixing them risks resource contention that can destabilize core Kubernetes services. Always separate system and user node pools for reliability.

5. How can I minimize downtime during AKS upgrades?

Use multiple node pools and staged upgrades with surge settings. Enable availability zones to maintain redundancy across fault domains during upgrades.

Contact Us