1. Incorrect Analysis Results
Understanding the Issue
LGTM may report false positives or fail to detect certain vulnerabilities, leading to incorrect code analysis results.
Root Causes
- Unsupported or incorrectly configured analysis rules.
- Code patterns that LGTM's static analysis does not recognize.
- Incorrect project settings affecting analysis accuracy.
Fix
Customize LGTM query rules to refine detection:
lgtm.yml queries: - id: java/sql-injection properties: severity: warning
Manually review flagged issues and adjust query filters.
Ensure LGTM is correctly configured for the project's language and framework.
2. Missing Alerts or False Negatives
Understanding the Issue
LGTM may fail to detect security vulnerabilities or quality issues in the codebase.
Root Causes
- Incomplete code indexing or skipped files.
- Excluded files due to misconfigured analysis settings.
- Unsupported or newly introduced language constructs.
Fix
Check the list of analyzed files to ensure coverage:
lgtm.yml extraction: cpp: index: include: - src/**
Update the LGTM analysis engine to support new language features:
lgtm upgrade
Manually test for vulnerabilities using CodeQL queries.
3. LGTM Build Failures
Understanding the Issue
LGTM may fail to build or analyze the project, preventing code quality checks.
Root Causes
- Missing dependencies required for static analysis.
- Build script issues affecting code compilation.
- Incorrect project configuration in LGTM.
Fix
Ensure all required dependencies are installed:
lgtm build --init
Verify that LGTM is using the correct build system:
lgtm.yml build: system: "autodetect"
Manually run the build process locally to check for errors.
4. Integration Challenges
Understanding the Issue
LGTM may fail to integrate with GitHub, GitLab, or CI/CD pipelines.
Root Causes
- Missing or invalid API tokens.
- Incorrect webhook configuration.
- Network or authentication issues.
Fix
Verify API tokens and authentication settings:
export LGTM_API_TOKEN=your_token
Ensure LGTM webhooks are correctly configured in the repository settings.
Check network logs for authentication errors and re-authenticate if needed.
5. Performance Bottlenecks
Understanding the Issue
LGTM analysis may take too long to complete, delaying feedback on code quality.
Root Causes
- Large codebases causing slow indexing and scanning.
- Complex queries requiring high computation.
- Limited computing resources affecting performance.
Fix
Optimize LGTM performance by limiting unnecessary analysis:
lgtm.yml queries: - exclude: - id: python/unused-import
Use incremental analysis to reduce reprocessing time.
Increase available computing resources if running LGTM on-premise.
Conclusion
LGTM provides a powerful platform for automated code analysis and security scanning, but troubleshooting incorrect analysis results, missing alerts, build failures, integration challenges, and performance bottlenecks is crucial for maintaining high-quality code. By following best practices in project configuration, dependency management, and query optimization, developers can ensure reliable and efficient use of LGTM.
FAQs
1. Why is LGTM reporting false positives?
Adjust query rules, manually review flagged issues, and refine analysis settings to reduce false positives.
2. How do I fix missing alerts in LGTM?
Check analysis settings, update LGTM to support new language features, and ensure complete code coverage.
3. How do I resolve LGTM build failures?
Ensure all dependencies are installed, verify the correct build system, and manually test the build process.
4. Why is LGTM not integrating with my repository?
Check API tokens, verify webhook configuration, and troubleshoot authentication or network issues.
5. How do I improve LGTM analysis performance?
Optimize queries, limit unnecessary analysis, and increase computing resources for on-premise deployments.