Understanding Chartio's Architecture

Data Pipeline Overview

Chartio connected to databases (e.g., PostgreSQL, MySQL, Redshift) and SaaS sources via JDBC/ODBC connectors. It used a schema browser and drag-and-drop UI for creating charts, with optional SQL Mode for power users.

Rendering and Query Execution

Queries executed server-side and visualized on the frontend via Vega or Plotly. Each dashboard panel could run independently or be parameter-driven, increasing load complexity.

Common Issues in Legacy Chartio Deployments

1. Broken Data Source Connections

Expired credentials, IP whitelisting changes, or SSL enforcement can sever data source links.

Fix:
- Revalidate DB credentials.
- Confirm updated inbound firewall/IP settings.
- For SSL: Ensure CA certs are updated and hostname validation is disabled if needed.

2. Query Timeout and Slow Performance

Legacy dashboards often contain unindexed joins, Cartesian products, or over-aggregated queries, causing timeouts.

Remediate:
- Simplify complex joins.
- Index key columns in source DB.
- Use derived tables or materialized views for expensive aggregations.

3. Visualization Rendering Errors

Charts may fail due to schema drift (renamed/removed fields), deprecated chart types, or unsupported browser behavior.

Steps:
1. Open chart in edit mode.
2. Validate all referenced fields still exist.
3. Switch to modern visualization type (e.g., Bar instead of Legacy Combo).

4. Data Pipeline Desync

Using transformation pipelines without clear documentation causes misalignment between expected and actual data outputs.

Tip: Document each pipeline stage.
Export pipeline JSON for versioning.
Cross-check against source tables regularly.

Advanced Diagnostics Techniques

Audit Query Logs

Access the query inspector to see raw SQL, execution times, and failed clauses. Especially useful when dashboard filters break silently.

Data Source Profiling

Use external tools (e.g., pg_stat_statements, MySQL slow query log) to identify Chartio-generated queries that affect DB performance.

Custom SQL Alerts

Configure alerting queries to flag null spikes, record count drops, or latency increases. Even in read-only mode, Chartio can emit alerts if configured pre-sunset.

Migrating From Chartio

Exporting Dashboards

Chartio allowed JSON exports for each dashboard and data source. These can be mapped into tools like Metabase or Redash with transformation.

Steps:
1. Export JSON config.
2. Identify data source UUIDs and map to new system.
3. Translate visual logic (e.g., CASE statements) to SQL or custom scripts.

Handling Schema Translation

Not all visualization tools interpret Chartio's logic layers the same way. Refactor derived columns and filters explicitly in SQL or views.

Managing User Access Parity

Chartio supported RBAC at data source and dashboard level. Ensure that migrated tools replicate these restrictions accurately.

Best Practice: Use group-based access tied to data source permissions instead of dashboard-level ACLs.

Step-by-Step Fixes for Post-Sunset Environments

Step 1: Inventory Existing Assets

1. List all dashboards with business owner contact.
2. Export JSON configs.
3. Archive critical metrics and definitions for lineage.

Step 2: Validate Data Source Health

1. Ping DB endpoints from Chartio's last-known IPs.
2. Reconfirm SSL/TLS settings.
3. Use proxy logs to detect blocked connections.

Step 3: Migrate and Refactor

1. Recreate dashboards in target BI tool.
2. Map each visualization logic manually.
3. Test with historical data for consistency checks.

Best Practices for Maintaining Chartio Legacy Systems

  • Export all dashboards before Atlassian deprovisions assets
  • Store JSON configs and schema in Git for traceability
  • Use mirrored staging DBs to test future BI tool migrations
  • Document business logic embedded in charts (e.g., filters, calculated fields)
  • Flag all Chartio-dependent KPIs for ownership reassignment

Conclusion

Even after its sunset, Chartio remains embedded in many enterprises' reporting workflows. By proactively auditing dashboards, revalidating connections, and preparing structured migration plans, teams can mitigate operational risk and preserve analytic continuity. Treating Chartio as technical debt that demands systematic offboarding ensures a clean transition to modern BI platforms.

FAQs

1. Is Chartio still supported?

No, Chartio was sunset by Atlassian. However, previously exported dashboards and configurations can still be used as references or for migrations.

2. Can I recover a lost Chartio dashboard?

Only if it was exported prior to shutdown. If not, you may reconstruct it using archived screenshots or SQL logic traced from source DBs.

3. How do I handle missing fields in legacy charts?

Identify schema changes in the source DB. Refactor the SQL or transformation layer to reflect current field names or structures.

4. What tools are best for migrating off Chartio?

Metabase, Redash, and Apache Superset are common open-source alternatives. Looker and Power BI are suitable for enterprise-grade replacements.

5. Can I automate the Chartio migration process?

Partial automation is possible using the exported JSON and custom scripts, but visualization logic often requires manual re-mapping in the target platform.