Resolving AQL Performance and Memory Bottlenecks in ArangoDB

Details: Category: Databases; By Mindful Chase; 21.Apr; Hits: 15

ArangoDB is a multi-model NoSQL database that supports document, key-value, and graph data models with a unified query language (AQL). While it offers flexibility and scalability, many teams operating large ArangoDB clusters encounter the recurring issue of "query performance degradation and memory pressure under complex AQL joins and traversals". These problems often occur in graph-heavy or analytics-driven workloads where multi-hop traversals or deep filter pipelines are executed frequently. This article breaks down ArangoDB’s execution engine, highlights root causes of slow queries, and provides tactical and architectural guidance to optimize performance and reduce memory stress.

Mindful Chase

Writing Code, Writing Stories

tbd

Experience

tbd

More to Explore

Understanding ArangoDB's Query Engine

AQL and Execution Plans

ArangoDB’s AQL (Arango Query Language) compiles into an execution plan consisting of operations like index scans, filters, joins, and traversals. Traversals (especially with GRAPH functions or FOR v, e, p IN ...) can be memory-intensive and lead to performance cliffs if not carefully bounded.

In-Memory Execution

Unlike databases that stream large result sets incrementally, AQL execution is largely in-memory. This makes memory planning critical, especially for queries returning thousands or millions of documents across collections.

Symptoms of Query and Memory Issues

Queries that run fine on small datasets begin to time out or crash on large data
High RAM usage on coordinator or DB servers
Query execution plans include full collection scans despite indexes
Graph traversals exceed memory limits or return incomplete paths
Queries hang or degrade entire cluster responsiveness

Root Causes

1. Unbounded Graph Traversals

Using ANY or deep INBOUND/OUTBOUND traversal depth without LIMIT or FILTER leads to massive path exploration, which exhausts memory and CPU.

2. Poor Index Utilization

Filters placed after joins or within traversal subqueries may prevent index use, leading to full scans.

3. Non-Selective Joins or Filters

Using COLLECT or FILTER on large result sets after joins or traversal inflates intermediate result size and memory usage.

4. Hot Coordinators in Cluster Mode

In clustered deployments, coordinators process and buffer results. Large AQL queries or high concurrency on one coordinator leads to pressure and timeouts.

5. Absence of Query Timeouts or Limits

Long-running analytics or exploratory queries without timeouts run unchecked, impacting cluster availability.

Diagnostics and Tools

1. Use `EXPLAIN` to Inspect Execution Plans

db._explain("FOR doc IN collection FILTER doc.x == 'val' RETURN doc")

Reveals index usage, sort operations, and traversal strategies.

2. Monitor Memory via ArangoMetrics

Use Prometheus or ArangoDB’s internal metrics endpoint to observe memory usage by query, collection, and coordinator node.

3. Enable Query Profiling

PROFILE keyword in AQL returns execution time and row counts per step:

db._query("PROFILE FOR x IN myCollection FILTER x.status == 'open' RETURN x")

4. Identify Slow Queries

Check _system/_admin/metrics or db._currentQueries() to identify long-running or queued queries.

5. Audit Graph Design with `arangosh`

Ensure edge definitions, directions, and indexing on edge collections are optimal for traversal patterns.

Step-by-Step Fix Strategy

1. Bound All Traversals

FOR v, e, p IN 1..3 OUTBOUND @start GRAPH 'MyGraph' FILTER v.type == 'device' LIMIT 100 RETURN p

Always specify min/max depth and LIMIT when using traversals to constrain resource usage.

2. Refactor Filters to Enable Index Use

Move filters before joins and ensure they reference indexed attributes directly. Avoid nested FILTERs that the optimizer can’t hoist.

3. Use `OPTIONS { strategy: 'depthfirst' }` for Large Graphs

Switching from breadth-first to depth-first traversal reduces memory usage when exploring long, sparse paths.

4. Distribute Query Load Across Coordinators

Balance client traffic and AQL queries across coordinators using external load balancers or client-side balancing logic.

5. Set Query Timeouts and Memory Limits

db._query(query, bindVars, { maxRuntime: 10, memoryLimit: 51200000 })

Prevents runaway queries from overwhelming the database. Tune based on use case and expected result size.

Best Practices

Use EXPLAIN before deploying any complex or recursive AQL
Ensure indexes exist and are utilized via appropriate FILTER order
Design graphs with predictable edge patterns and filtered traversals
Limit intermediate result sets with early LIMIT or slicing
Use ArangoSearch views for full-text or complex filter optimization

Conclusion

ArangoDB’s flexibility makes it ideal for rich, interconnected data—but complex AQL queries, especially traversals, demand careful tuning. Understanding how execution plans interact with memory and the optimizer is key to scaling effectively. By bounding queries, profiling performance, tuning filters, and balancing coordinator load, teams can avoid resource exhaustion and keep ArangoDB clusters stable and performant under real-world loads.

FAQs

1. Why does my graph traversal crash or return incomplete results?

Unbounded traversal depth or large result sets can exceed memory or runtime limits. Always use LIMIT and depth constraints.

2. How do I know if an index is used?

Use EXPLAIN and inspect the execution nodes. If you see IndexNode rather than EnumerateCollectionNode, the index is being used.

3. What’s the default memory limit for a query?

By default, ArangoDB allows large memory usage, but you can set limits per query with memoryLimit in options (in bytes).

4. Can I cancel a running query?

Yes. Use db._killQuery(queryId) after retrieving the ID from db._currentQueries().

5. Is ArangoSearch better for performance than traversal?

For search-heavy or filtered document retrieval, yes. ArangoSearch views use inverted indexes and are optimized for performance.

Contact Us