Sahi Pro at Scale: Diagnosing Performance and Stability Issues in Enterprise Automation Testing

Details: Category: Testing Frameworks; By Mindful Chase; 10.Aug; Hits: 5

Sahi Pro is a powerful automation testing framework designed for web applications, supporting complex enterprise-grade test scenarios. Its ability to handle dynamic elements, record-playback workflows, and large-scale data-driven tests makes it attractive for QA teams. However, in high-volume, continuous testing environments, teams can encounter subtle but impactful issues—such as memory leaks during prolonged test runs, inconsistent element identification in dynamic DOMs, and performance degradation caused by unoptimized playback scripts. These challenges often surface only under full regression loads, making targeted troubleshooting essential for architects and QA leads.

Mindful Chase

Writing Code, Writing Stories

tbd

Experience

tbd

More to Explore

Background: Sahi Pro in Enterprise Testing

Why Enterprises Use Sahi Pro

Sahi Pro supports multiple browsers, complex AJAX-heavy applications, and integrates well with CI/CD pipelines. Its scriptless testing features and rich API make it accessible to both technical and non-technical testers. However, enterprise-scale adoption can introduce bottlenecks if test design and execution strategies are not optimized for stability and scalability.

Where Problems Arise

When executing thousands of tests in parallel, Sahi Pro's resource footprint can grow significantly, particularly if sessions are not cleaned up between runs. Complex dynamic web pages can also lead to locator instability, causing flaky tests and false failures that slow down release cycles.

Architectural Implications

Resource Utilization and Scalability

Sahi Pro uses proxy-based browser automation, maintaining session data and element caches. Inadequate session cleanup or unoptimized object storage can lead to memory leaks and CPU spikes during long-running jobs.

Dynamic DOM Handling

While Sahi Pro offers resilient locators, highly dynamic SPAs can still generate timing and synchronization issues. Without strategic waits or smart identification, tests may intermittently fail despite no actual defects.

Diagnostics

Step 1: Monitoring Memory and CPU Usage

Track Java heap usage of the Sahi Pro process during extended runs using JVisualVM or similar tools. Look for continuous upward trends without garbage collection recovery.

# Example JVM monitoring
jvisualvm --openpid <SahiProPID>

Step 2: Identifying Flaky Tests

Review execution logs to find repeated failures in the same scripts without code changes. Use Sahi Pro's debug mode to capture DOM states at failure points.

_log("Debugging test failure for element: " + _link("Submit"));

Step 3: Measuring Locator Resolution Time

Enable detailed logs for element searches to detect slow or repeated resolution attempts.

Common Pitfalls

Not releasing browser sessions after test completion.
Over-reliance on text-based locators in dynamic UI contexts.
Running excessive parallel threads on undersized infrastructure.
Neglecting to clean up large datasets generated during data-driven testing.

Step-by-Step Fix

1. Optimize Test Session Management

Explicitly close browsers and clear sessions in teardown steps to prevent resource leaks.

_closeBrowser();
_clearCookies();

2. Use Stable Locators

Leverage Sahi Pro's relative positioning and stable attribute locators for elements in dynamic DOMs.

3. Implement Smart Wait Strategies

Replace fixed waits with conditional waits that check for element states, reducing flakiness.

_wait(_isVisible(_div("#status")), 5000);

4. Control Parallel Execution

Right-size parallel execution threads based on CPU and memory capacity of the test infrastructure.

5. Archive and Purge Test Artifacts

Automate cleanup of old screenshots, logs, and temporary files to prevent disk space issues.

Best Practices

Maintain a locator repository to avoid duplication and improve stability.
Run periodic long-duration soak tests to detect memory leaks early.
Integrate Sahi Pro reporting into centralized dashboards for visibility.
Use data-driven testing judiciously to avoid excessive dataset growth.
Version-control test scripts for traceability and change tracking.

Conclusion

Sahi Pro can deliver robust automation for complex enterprise applications, but scaling requires disciplined resource management, stable locator strategies, and proactive monitoring. By addressing session leaks, improving locator resilience, and tuning execution parameters, QA leaders can ensure Sahi Pro remains a reliable pillar of the testing strategy.

FAQs

1. Why does Sahi Pro slow down during long test runs?

Likely due to memory leaks from unclosed browser sessions or large in-memory caches. Regular session cleanup mitigates this.

2. How can I make locators more reliable?

Use Sahi Pro's DOM-relative and attribute-based locators rather than relying solely on visible text.

3. Can parallel execution hurt performance?

Yes, if infrastructure resources are insufficient. Balance concurrency against available CPU, RAM, and network bandwidth.

4. How do I detect flaky tests in Sahi Pro?

Track repeat failures across multiple runs without code changes. Use debug logs and DOM snapshots for root cause analysis.

5. Does Sahi Pro support CI/CD integration?

Yes, it integrates with Jenkins, Bamboo, and other CI tools. Ensure CI jobs include proper setup and teardown for stability.

Contact Us