Troubleshooting LoadRunner Failures in Enterprise Load Testing

Details: Category: Testing Frameworks; By Mindful Chase; 31.Jul; Hits: 10

LoadRunner by Micro Focus is a leading performance testing tool used by large enterprises to simulate real-world user load on applications. While powerful, LoadRunner scripts and scenarios often produce unreliable or inconsistent results in complex test environments. From correlation failures to network bottlenecks and runtime errors during high-load scenarios, teams must go beyond basic debugging to ensure reliable performance metrics. This article focuses on advanced troubleshooting techniques for LoadRunner, helping performance engineers and architects resolve persistent issues and optimize large-scale test executions.

Mindful Chase

Writing Code, Writing Stories

tbd

Experience

tbd

More to Explore

Understanding Common LoadRunner Failures

Script Failures Due to Dynamic Values

Modern web apps frequently return session-specific values that must be correlated correctly. If correlation fails, scripts may work during recording but break during playback.

// Example correlation code
web_reg_save_param_ex(
  "ParamName=sessionID",
  "LB=\"session_id\":\"",
  "RB=\"",
  SEARCH_FILTERS,
  LAST);

Test Execution Inconsistencies

Scripts that pass in VuGen may fail in Controller or Load Generator (LG) due to environment mismatches, host configuration, or missing runtime libraries.

Load Generator Bottlenecks

During high load, LG machines may max out CPU, memory, or network, leading to dropped connections and inaccurate TPS (transactions per second) metrics.

Architectural Considerations in Load Testing

Controller, LG, and AUT Architecture

LoadRunner tests consist of:

VuGen: Script development and unit validation
Controller: Scenario management and execution
Load Generators: Machines simulating virtual users
Application Under Test (AUT): Target system

Common Deployment Issues

Firewall restrictions between Controller and LGs
Different locale/encoding on LGs causing script parsing errors
Improper user permissions on Windows LGs blocking socket creation

Diagnostics and Monitoring

VuGen Log Analysis

// Enable extended logging
lr_set_debug_message(LR_MSG_CLASS_EXTENDED_LOG | LR_MSG_CLASS_PARAMETERS, LR_SWITCH_ON);

This exposes correlation values, parameter substitutions, and response codes for each request.

Monitor LG Health

Use Resource Monitor for CPU, memory, network
Verify Agent Process and LoadRunner Agent are running
Check error logs in lg_host\output\*.log

Analyze Controller Logs and Errors

C:\ProgramData\Micro Focus\LoadRunner\logs\controller\*

Check for license errors, communication failures, or scenario misconfigurations.

Common Pitfalls and Root Causes

Improper Correlation

Relying on auto-correlation often misses complex dynamic tokens or JavaScript-generated values. Use web_reg_save_param_ex with accurate boundaries and validation logic.

Non-Reusable Scripts

Hardcoded credentials, static URLs, or session-dependent payloads make scripts fragile. Parameterize all user data and extract session-specific values dynamically.

Unrealistic Think Times and Pacing

Default think times may underrepresent real-world user behavior, while lack of pacing overloads AUT unrealistically.

lr_think_time(5); // Simulate user pause
lr_ramp_up(10, 60); // Ramp 10 users over 60 seconds

Step-by-Step Remediation Plan

1. Validate All Correlations

Use Snapshot View to inspect dynamic values
Log response body to verify token capture
Fail fast with lr_exit(LR_EXIT_VUSER, LR_FAIL); on correlation failure

2. Isolate Script Errors

Run in VuGen with extended logs and verify all response codes (should be 200 or expected redirects).

3. Validate LG Environment

Match VuGen and LG software versions
Test connectivity to AUT from each LG
Increase LG count if CPU > 80% during runs

4. Stabilize Scenario Configuration

// Recommended pacing setup
Pacing: 1 iteration every 60 seconds per user
Think Time: Randomized between 3–7 seconds
Ramp-up: Stagger users to prevent spikes

5. Monitor System and Network

Use SiteScope or built-in monitors for AUT metrics
Track errors like HTTP 500s, timeout exceptions
Log dropped connections and socket failures

Best Practices for Long-Term LoadRunner Stability

Parameterize all external input, especially credentials and user data
Use Service Virtualization for unavailable dependencies during tests
Implement custom checkpoints to validate functional correctness during load
Keep LG machines dedicated and isolated from other workloads
Review error summary and transaction breakdown after every test

Conclusion

LoadRunner is a mature and scalable tool, but misconfigured scripts, overlooked correlations, or overburdened Load Generators can lead to inaccurate or failed test runs. Through precise diagnostics, controlled environment setup, and proactive parameterization, teams can achieve reliable and repeatable performance testing. Integrating LoadRunner into CI pipelines with dynamic scaling and infrastructure monitoring ensures performance regressions are caught early and resolved confidently.

FAQs

1. Why does a script work in VuGen but fail in Controller?

This usually indicates environment or data dependency differences. Ensure dynamic values are correlated and LGs mirror VuGen’s configuration.

2. How can I reduce CPU usage on Load Generators?

Distribute users across more LGs, reduce logging, disable unnecessary rendezvous points, and avoid excessive JavaScript or web service parsing.

3. What causes "No match found for the requested parameter" errors?

This occurs when correlation boundaries fail. Check the raw response for missing tokens or incorrect LB/RB values.

4. Is it safe to disable think time?

Disabling think time may help during stress tests but leads to unrealistic user behavior. Always enable it during baseline or load validation.

5. Can LoadRunner handle cloud-based app testing?

Yes. Load Generators can be deployed on cloud instances. Ensure proper firewall, DNS resolution, and access permissions for stable execution.

Contact Us